Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Be the first person to like this.
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Be the first person to like this.
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Evolutionists often interpret any beneficial mutation as evidence that Darwinism is true. After all, aren’t beneficial mutations all that is required for Darwinian evolution to occur? So long as there... View More
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Be the first person to like this.
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
“Life is so complex that small changes can’t explain it.” – Robert Carter, PhD Marine Biologist https://isgenesishistory.com/10-genius-design/?fbclid=IwAR0dajBcyiXfoJoV8F374Ts3f5Cp32lty_CumeO2g0YsPWq... View More
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Though the COVID virus has mutated, no new genetic information has been generated nor have novel features developed as needed if evolution were true. It is clear that viruses as a whole are divinely-d... View More
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
The window of time established by the fossil record for the transition from “walking whales” to fully marine whales is orders of magnitude too short to accommodate the waiting times for the origin and... View More
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
Allen: I am an atheist and evolutionist. Prove to me there is a God. Paul: I do not think I can do that because of your presuppositions. Allen: Why not?... View More
Be the first person to like this.
Macroevolution is Pseudoscience
In New Scientist, a leading popular science journal: Colin Barras agreed that every claimed fossil link between apes and men has failed or, at least, is very problematic and controversial. In the 3 Se... View More
Load More